As a Christian, God doesn't tell us the minute details of how He shaped, and formed the earth. How many layers were used to build mountain peaks, how mature were the trees and plants, animals, and man, for that matter. The Hebrew language, according to scholars and Rabbis , on both sides of the creation and Evolution debate, interpreting the creation story as six 24 hr. days and also interpret the Hebrew as saying there was a global flood with total destruction of everything, except what was on the Ark.
The fossil and geological records and the science involved with them, show me that the weakness for a YEC, like me, is in this area of reading the signs buried in the earth.
The fossil and geological records and the science involved with them, show me that the weakness for a YEC, like me, is in this area of reading the signs buried in the earth.
Question 1: Is the Bible wrong, Hebrew is wrong, or mis-interpreted?
I think the weakness for Evolutionists and LEC ( Long Earth Creationists )( some get offended by Old) Christians is in the estimated population dynamics and/or the estimated animal population dynamics.
When dealing with the standard of each couple having two children, there are 20 generations to the first million. According to everything I have researched over the last two days, estimated population at 10,000 BC is between 500,000 and 1,000,000. The error rate decreases exponentially the smaller the population according to everything I've read.
19 generations to 500,000 people. 20 generations to 1,000,000 people.
A lot of the models show zero growth between 8,000 BC to 5,000 BC
When dealing with the standard of each couple having two children, there are 20 generations to the first million. According to everything I have researched over the last two days, estimated population at 10,000 BC is between 500,000 and 1,000,000. The error rate decreases exponentially the smaller the population according to everything I've read.
19 generations to 500,000 people. 20 generations to 1,000,000 people.
A lot of the models show zero growth between 8,000 BC to 5,000 BC
Question 2: Is there a reason for 0 growth between 8 & 5 thousand BC?
History tells us of not only great tragedy in our early history, but that before the industrial revolution, families were much bigger than 2 children, especially in business and farming families. Accordingly the population had the potential to grow much faster than current models with only 2 children per family. Again the models I looked at had populations between 500,000 and one million in the year 10,000 BC. According to Evolutionists and LEC Christians people have been around for millions of years.
Question 3: If man has been around for millions of years, Why were there only 1,000,000 people or less at 10,000 BC?
Helps that I found?
http://waynesword.palomar.edu/lmexer9.htm#questions
Extra information gained from my research, estimated to come to the world soon! http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/looking-back-on-the-limits-of-growth-125269840/#
Extra information gained from my research, estimated to come to the world soon! http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/looking-back-on-the-limits-of-growth-125269840/#
No comments:
Post a Comment